[Taxacom] Now 2 species/genera in Placozoa...
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sun Aug 5 17:42:49 CDT 2018
Sure they "can be" placed in distinct genera. I was just suggesting that genera (or higher Linnean ranks) are not really, in my opinion, suitable as proxies for "distinctiveness". They are just ways to break down complexity into convenient monophyletic groups, but with just two species, there is no complexity. Anyway [Big sigh!], the paper appears to be published e-only without ZooBank preregistration, so the new names don't exist anyway!!
On Mon, 6/8/18, Tony Rees <tonyrees49 at gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Now 2 species/genera in Placozoa...
To: "Stephen Thorpe" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
Cc: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Monday, 6 August, 2018, 10:35 AM
From my (limited)
comprehension of the molecular data, the 2 presently
described species are just representatives of 2 very
distinct molecular groupings, see diagram at http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005359.g003
On a purely hypothetical basis, I do
not see why a newly described species could not be placed in
its own genus or any other desired higher taxon (even
kingdom), if that is used as a proxy for its claimed
morphological or genetic distinctiveness.
Regards - Tony
Tony Rees, New South Wales,
On Mon, 6
Aug 2018 at 08:22, Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
don't agree with putting the new species in a new genus!
Genera cannot be correlated consistently with degree or
"depth" of divergence, and really only serve to
separate convenient monophyletic groups, but there is no
gain in separating two species into two separate genera.
On Mon, 6/8/18, Tony Rees <tonyrees49 at gmail.com>
Subject: [Taxacom] Now 2 species/genera in Placozoa...
To: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Monday, 6 August, 2018, 10:09 AM
In case anypne interested missed it, there
are now 2 described
species/genera in Placozoa, doubling
the size of that curious phylum:
They still all look the same,
apparently, but that's another issue.
Regards - Tony
Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
Taxacom Mailing List
Send Taxacom mailing list submissions
to: Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
Web, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the
list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting
Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
More information about the Taxacom