Mary.Barkworth at usu.edu
Thu Feb 15 02:51:26 CST 2018
Yes, it is meaningless. A name can have be a holotype or a lectotype - but not both. Hence Paul's comment. Perhaps you can tell the author(s) which they seem to be referring to (assuming is one or the other) and help them understand the difference?
From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Gallo
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 11:42 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] HOLOLECTOTYPE
Hi to all
I apologize for the annoyance but I've a question to solve as a referee.
I'm working (as a referee) on a paper where is mentioned the word HOLOLECTOTYPE referred to botanical specimens.
This term Is unknown in the ICN, so seems useless and wrong. What do you think of this ?
Thanks and best regards
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
More information about the Taxacom