[Taxacom] UNESCO Open Science Recommendation

Stephen Thorpe stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Wed Mar 4 17:03:27 CST 2020


 Carlos,I am calm, I'm just saying it as it is. What you describe is an idealistic vision of how things might pan out, but I strongly suspect that the way things actually pan out will be determined by the power of the $. Publishers aren't going to give up their current profit margins without a fight, and if they can negotiate a mutually profitable deal with publicly funded research institutions to secure a bigger share of the public purse, then that is by far the most likely outcome. There is already a lot of "spin", putting this in terms of "public good", i.e. "free" access by the public to publicly funded research, when it is nothing of the sort!Cheers, Stephen
    On Wednesday, 4 March 2020, 09:37:08 pm UTC, Carlos Alberto Martínez Muñoz <biotemail at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Hi Stephen,What you have not understood is that:1) by shifting from for-profit OA private publishing to non-profit OA academic publishing we could cut OA expenses down by up to 1/3 of the current expenses and2) use those funds to actually produce more OA research or to maintain the actual level while investing more on platform development.Calm down, drink some ice tea and read my emails again. You will see that I already explained 1 and 2. Of course that no technology can help us against greed. That's why we have to fight it, no matter if it comes from private publishers, from institutions or from unscrupulous scientists or managerial staff.
Cheers,Carlos
Carlos A. Martínez MuñozZoological Museum, Biodiversity UnitFI-20014 University of TurkuFinlandResearchGate profileMyriapod Morphology and Evolution

 

El mié., 4 mar. 2020 a las 22:16, Stephen Thorpe (<stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>) escribió:

 "In the context of pressing planetary and socio-economic challenges," diverting $billions of public funds into OA/OS initiatives, so as to boost the profits of research institutions working with public money, is clearly one of the biggest con jobs of the 21st Century. It has to result in either: (1) less research being done with the same amount of public funding; or(2) more public funding being diverted to science to maintain the same level of research, funding which cannot therefore be spent on "pressing planetary and socio-economic challenges".
Witness the subterfuges used by the wealthy half (third, quarter?) of humanity to further their own interests at the expense of the interests of "the outgroup"...
Stephen
    On Wednesday, 4 March 2020, 10:41:59 am UTC, Carlos Alberto Martínez Muñoz via Taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:  
 
 Dear Taxacomers,
Please note that the questionnaire for inputs into the development of the
UNESCO Open Science Recommendation is available online here (
https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-launches-global-consultation-develop-standard-setting-instrument-open-science)
and here (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/N958HFW).

In the context of pressing planetary and socio-economic challenges,
sustainable and innovative solutions must be supported by an efficient,
transparent and vibrant scientific effort - not only stemming from the
scientific community, but from the whole society. Open Science embodies the
need to transform and democratize the entire scientific process to ensure
that science truly drives and enables the achievement of the United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals for the benefits of all.

Driven by unprecedented advances in our digital world, the transition to
Open Science allows scientific information, data and outputs to be more
widely accessible (Open Access) and more reliably harnessed (Open Data)
with the active engagement of all relevant stakeholders (Open to Society).
However, in the fragmented scientific and policy environment, a global
understanding of the meaning, opportunities and challenges of Open Science
is still missing.

UNESCO, as the United Nations Agency with a mandate for Science, is the
legitimate global organization enabled to build a coherent vision of Open
Science and a shared set of overarching principles and shared values. That
is why, at the 40th session of UNESCO’s General Conference, 193 Member
States tasked the Organization with the development of an international
standard-setting instrument on Open Science in the form of a UNESCO
Recommendation on Open Science.

UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science will be prepared through a regionally
balanced, multistakeholder, inclusive and transparent consultation process.
This process is guided by an Open Science Advisory Committee and is
expected to lead to the adoption of the Recommendation by UNESCO Member
States in 2021.

As UNESCO launches its consultation process on Open Science, an online
survey is designed to conduct inputs from all the regions and the
interested stakeholders, about aspects, benefits and challenges of Open
Science across the globe.

All Open Science stakeholders, including scientists and scientific
institutes, science publishers, science policy makers etc., are encouraged
to participate and  to share their insights trough a global survey
<https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/N958HFW>. In addition, you can help the
collection of a broader perspective on Open Science by sharing this survey
among your network.

The questionnaire is also available for download
<https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/questionnaire_unesco_open_science.pdf>.
It can be filled offline and sent to us by email at: openscience at unesco.org
(link sends e-mail) <openscience at unesco.org>.

I wonder if some day we will pair the Codes of Nomenclature with Open
Science and mandate that all new names and nomenclatural acts, to be
available, have to be published open access. Names form the basis of our
biodiversity informatics services and they shouldn't continue to be born in
paywalled publications. We are the keepers of scientific names and taxon
descriptions. We should strive for them to be accessible.
Regards,

Carlos A. Martínez Muñoz
Zoological Museum, Biodiversity Unit
FI-20014 University of Turku
Finland
ResearchGate profile
<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlos_Martinez-Munoz>
Myriapod Morphology and Evolution
<https://www.facebook.com/groups/205802113162102/>
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years, 1987-2020.
  
  


More information about the Taxacom mailing list