[Taxacom] Global counts of accepted genera
Paul van Rijckevorsel
dipteryx at freeler.nl
Tue Mar 31 04:34:44 CDT 2020
So some sixty percent of all published generic
names is deemed current? That seems like a
high percentage; perhaps this is a testimony of
a backlog in taxonomic work?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Rees via Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
To: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>; "Tony Rees"
<tonyrees49 at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 4:40 AM
Subject: [Taxacom] Global counts of accepted genera
> Dear Taxacomers,
> Have you ever wondered how many genus names for accepted taxa have been
> published, broken down by taxonomic group? and/or "all names", synonyms
> (sensu lato) included (together with the actual lists of names as a
> downloadable file) - well, the following newly published paper in the
> journal "Megataxa" goes some way to answering these questions:
> Rees et al., 2020: "All genera of the world: an overview and estimates
> based on the March 2020 release of the Interim Register of Marine and
> Nonmarine Genera (IRMNG)"
> In case this is of interest, in the present "interesting" times...
> Regards to all - Tony
> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years, 1987-2020.
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
More information about the Taxacom