[Taxacom] the family Tortricidae or just Tortricidae

Robert Zuparko rz at berkeley.edu
Tue Oct 13 10:07:37 CDT 2020


As to your point one: I can see three different explanations here:

1. It MAY be a matter of the perceived audience: if one is addressing
(either in print or in person) an audience of lepidopterists, then
"Tortricidae" is sufficient and adding the phrase "the family" does seem
redundant to me. However, if one is addressing an audience of layfolk, who
know little about nomenclature, emphasizing the taxonomic level could be
useful.

2. Again, when focusing on taxonomic classification, adding "the family"
helps add emphasis to a point one is trying to make

3. Some people are a bit on the, er, garrulous side.

-Bob

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 5:04 AM Paul van Rijckevorsel via Taxacom <
taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:

> I agree with Ken. All three options can be correct.
> It depends on context and intent.
>
> Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kenneth Kinman via Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> To: <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 8:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] the family Tortricidae or just Tortricidae
>
>
> >     1.  I don't think it is necessarily redundant, because -idae is not
> > only the ending for animal family names, but it is also the ending for
> > plant subclasses (such as Rosidae).
> >     2.  As for being singular or plural, it depends on the context
> within
> > the sentence.  Tortricidae are tortricids, so it can be plural
> > ("Tortricidae are moths").   But "Family Tortricidae" is a single group
> as
> > a taxon, especially when used as the subject of a sentence.  "Family
> > Tortricidae is speciose".   If you don't explicitly refer to it as a
> > family, you could say "Tortricidae are speciose" or "Tortricidae is
> > speciose", depending the context (plural  tortricids or as a single
> > taxon).   Likewise, you could say "Rosidae are speciose" (meaning rosids
> > are speciose), but it would be "Rosidae is speciose" if you are
> referring
> > to the subclass (a singular taxon).   Perhaps it is best to make your
> > meaning clear by saying "Rosids are a speciose group" or "Subclass
> Rosidae
> > is a speciose group".   Same for Tortricids and Family Tortricidae.
> >                  ---------------Hope this helps,
> >                                                       Ken
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Soowon
> Cho
> > via Taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 8:47 PM
> > To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> > Subject: [Taxacom] the family Tortricidae or just Tortricidae
> >
> > Dear members,
> >
> > As a non-native English speaker, I have two questions and really hope you
> > could help me.
> > 1. I feel curious about why people add "the family", "the subfamily",
> "the
> > genus", etc. in front of the scientific name in writing: for example,
> "the
> > family Tortricidae" instead of just "Tortricidae". Is there a pattern or
> > rule in English? I thought it is redundant when we know Tortricidae with
> > idae-ending means it is a family name.
> > 2. Sometimes I see Tortricidae, Tortricinae, or genus name Tortrix is
> > treated as a singular, but sometimes as a plural noun. I thought, based
> on
> > the ICZN, they are basically plural, but, in many cases, they are
> > considered as a singular noun. Spell checker also treats them as a
> > singular
> > form. This may or may not be an English question, but I hope someone
> > please
> > let me know how to distinguish between the two.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > --
> > Soowon Cho
> > chosoowon at gmail.com
> > Dept Plant Medicine
> > Chungbuk Nat'l Univ
> > Cheongju, 361-763
> > KOREA
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> >
> > Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > You can reach the person managing the list at:
> > taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> > http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years,
> 1987-2020.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> >
> > Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > You can reach the person managing the list at:
> > taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> > http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years,
> 1987-2020.
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years, 1987-2020.
>


-- 
Robert Zuparko
Essig Museum of Entomology
1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, #4780
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-3112
(510) 643-0804


<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>


More information about the Taxacom mailing list